<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bullish Miller Bets Against Whitney with Tice and Rogers Also Bearish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enlightened-american.com/2009/05/13/bullish-miller-bets-against-whitney-with-tice-and-rogers-also-bearish/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enlightened-american.com/2009/05/13/bullish-miller-bets-against-whitney-with-tice-and-rogers-also-bearish</link>
	<description>One person's quest to make sense of a senseless American economy and society.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:26:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://enlightened-american.com/2009/05/13/bullish-miller-bets-against-whitney-with-tice-and-rogers-also-bearish/comment-page-1#comment-14188</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 04:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enlightened-american.com/?p=352#comment-14188</guid>
		<description>Jeremy Grantham&#039;s latest letter is an ABSOLUTE must read! It seems very likely that he&#039;s correct.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/15027007/GMO-Jeremy-Grantham-Quarterly-Letter-May-09

The problem with Whitney is that she can be right about all the problems. It doesn&#039;t mean the market hasn&#039;t already priced it in. Especially given that banks can earn their way back into positive tangible equity.

Klarman says it best...
&quot;As Seth Klarman explains in Margin of Safety when you make macro calls you need to be right on the call, make it before everyone else does, make it before the market has priced it in, convert the idea into the correct trades, identify when the trend has become correctly priced and again trade out. This is vastly harder than buying undervalued securities of businesses and then selling them when they reach fair value&quot; http://longterm.blogspot.com/2008/12/turnaround.html

Good luck with your new venture!

Cheers, Neil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy Grantham&#8217;s latest letter is an ABSOLUTE must read! It seems very likely that he&#8217;s correct.<br />
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/15027007/GMO-Jeremy-Grantham-Quarterly-Letter-May-09" rel="nofollow">http://www.scribd.com/doc/15027007/GMO-Jeremy-Grantham-Quarterly-Letter-May-09</a></p>
<p>The problem with Whitney is that she can be right about all the problems. It doesn&#8217;t mean the market hasn&#8217;t already priced it in. Especially given that banks can earn their way back into positive tangible equity.</p>
<p>Klarman says it best&#8230;<br />
&#8220;As Seth Klarman explains in Margin of Safety when you make macro calls you need to be right on the call, make it before everyone else does, make it before the market has priced it in, convert the idea into the correct trades, identify when the trend has become correctly priced and again trade out. This is vastly harder than buying undervalued securities of businesses and then selling them when they reach fair value&#8221; <a href="http://longterm.blogspot.com/2008/12/turnaround.html" rel="nofollow">http://longterm.blogspot.com/2008/12/turnaround.html</a></p>
<p>Good luck with your new venture!</p>
<p>Cheers, Neil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

