<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Things, Including Duopolies, Must Pass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enlightened-american.com/2010/03/17/all-things-including-duopolies-must-pass/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enlightened-american.com/2010/03/17/all-things-including-duopolies-must-pass</link>
	<description>One person's quest to make sense of a senseless American economy and society.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:26:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy Bui</title>
		<link>http://enlightened-american.com/2010/03/17/all-things-including-duopolies-must-pass/comment-page-1#comment-32286</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy Bui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enlightened-american.com/?p=659#comment-32286</guid>
		<description>Hey guys, thanks for the comments. The book looks interesting; without having read it, I can&#039;t comment too much but it seems a worthy addition and hopefully helps business people (&amp; investors) walk that fine line between obsolescence, missed opportunities and the misguided instinct to grow at any costs (see MSFT).  

Thomas, both companies have been on my watchlist for years -- they never make it to subscribers because they simply aren&#039;t cheap enough. They would have if EA-Premium had been active last March &amp; in fact, I did seriously consider adding JOYG to the portfolio but alas, another missed opportunity. I kid you not when I say the most valuable aspect of EA-Premium may be the stocks I highlight but DON&#039;T BUY! I know at least one subscriber made a nice gain on Monsanto (MON) earlier this year when I spotlighted it as a possible Charlie Munger great-company-fair-price opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, thanks for the comments. The book looks interesting; without having read it, I can&#8217;t comment too much but it seems a worthy addition and hopefully helps business people (&#038; investors) walk that fine line between obsolescence, missed opportunities and the misguided instinct to grow at any costs (see MSFT).  </p>
<p>Thomas, both companies have been on my watchlist for years &#8212; they never make it to subscribers because they simply aren&#8217;t cheap enough. They would have if EA-Premium had been active last March &#038; in fact, I did seriously consider adding JOYG to the portfolio but alas, another missed opportunity. I kid you not when I say the most valuable aspect of EA-Premium may be the stocks I highlight but DON&#8217;T BUY! I know at least one subscriber made a nice gain on Monsanto (MON) earlier this year when I spotlighted it as a possible Charlie Munger great-company-fair-price opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turniptruck</title>
		<link>http://enlightened-american.com/2010/03/17/all-things-including-duopolies-must-pass/comment-page-1#comment-32267</link>
		<dc:creator>Turniptruck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enlightened-american.com/?p=659#comment-32267</guid>
		<description>Davy,

Just a thought, recently I&#039;ve become aware of a duopoly in the mining industry: Joy Global (JOYG) and Bucyrus International (BUCY), a couple of mid-caps who make the big machines (and sell lots of high margin replacement parts for those machines). While these are not necessarily cheap today, if one factors in a little global instability going forward, maybe there is something here worth a look:   

Sort of paraphrasing Jim Rogers - the commodity guru - his global outlook for 2010/2011 resembles a big, bloated bug buzzing blindly around oblivious to the fast approaching windshield. 

While piling new debt atop of old debt, governments globally continue to print money for what they cannot borrow. His belief, then, is to sell paper money and buy assets/commodities which will appreciate in (some) proportion to the amount of paper being created. Assets will go up for the simple reason that there will be more paper chasing the same (approximate) number of assets.

So I&#039;m thinking that maybe some of this paper will find its way to pick and shovel companies whose products will become increasingly in demanded to dig for new assets. As in the Cali gold rush of 1848, the miners themselves profited little, but suppliers danced all the way to the bank.  
 
Ahem (here it comes), as I believe mining is solidly within your circle, do you think that there might be a story here worth investigating for (hint, hint) E-A premium subscribers? 

thanks,
thomas

Reference:  http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=27977001</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Davy,</p>
<p>Just a thought, recently I&#8217;ve become aware of a duopoly in the mining industry: Joy Global (JOYG) and Bucyrus International (BUCY), a couple of mid-caps who make the big machines (and sell lots of high margin replacement parts for those machines). While these are not necessarily cheap today, if one factors in a little global instability going forward, maybe there is something here worth a look:   </p>
<p>Sort of paraphrasing Jim Rogers &#8211; the commodity guru &#8211; his global outlook for 2010/2011 resembles a big, bloated bug buzzing blindly around oblivious to the fast approaching windshield. </p>
<p>While piling new debt atop of old debt, governments globally continue to print money for what they cannot borrow. His belief, then, is to sell paper money and buy assets/commodities which will appreciate in (some) proportion to the amount of paper being created. Assets will go up for the simple reason that there will be more paper chasing the same (approximate) number of assets.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m thinking that maybe some of this paper will find its way to pick and shovel companies whose products will become increasingly in demanded to dig for new assets. As in the Cali gold rush of 1848, the miners themselves profited little, but suppliers danced all the way to the bank.  </p>
<p>Ahem (here it comes), as I believe mining is solidly within your circle, do you think that there might be a story here worth investigating for (hint, hint) E-A premium subscribers? </p>
<p>thanks,<br />
thomas</p>
<p>Reference:  <a href="http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=27977001" rel="nofollow">http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=27977001</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HelicalZz</title>
		<link>http://enlightened-american.com/2010/03/17/all-things-including-duopolies-must-pass/comment-page-1#comment-32192</link>
		<dc:creator>HelicalZz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enlightened-american.com/?p=659#comment-32192</guid>
		<description>Davy,

You should look at the book &#039;Stall Points&#039; put out (promotionally) by The Corporate Executive Board.  While it iterates an older study, and could stand to have more anecdotes and detail, it is one of those &#039;worth having read&#039; books.

http://www.amazon.com/Stall-Points-Companies-Growing-MostYours-Doesnt/dp/0300136870

In my opinion, you can&#039;t be a large cap / dividend investor without a good sense of the potential for rule breaking / invasive technologies and industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Davy,</p>
<p>You should look at the book &#8216;Stall Points&#8217; put out (promotionally) by The Corporate Executive Board.  While it iterates an older study, and could stand to have more anecdotes and detail, it is one of those &#8216;worth having read&#8217; books.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Stall-Points-Companies-Growing-MostYours-Doesnt/dp/0300136870" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Stall-Points-Companies-Growing-MostYours-Doesnt/dp/0300136870</a></p>
<p>In my opinion, you can&#8217;t be a large cap / dividend investor without a good sense of the potential for rule breaking / invasive technologies and industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

